Who the hell i s river song?????/?!
Question: Who the hell i s river song!?!?!?!?!?/!?
just seen a preview of saturdays prog dr who web page and it shows river song telling the dr that in hte future she someone who he can really trust thats why she got sonic screwdriver and she calls him yan wasnt the masters name b4 he changed yana is this a timelord name thing and then she said that she was going to prove to him that she can be trusted and says im sorry im so so sorry and leans to his ear to go tell him something but then it cuts off !.!.!.!.!.!.!.!. BUT ive just seen a video on you tube called time war a sham and its puts a differnt perspective on the whole timelord thing which could explain alot to what the fianle is going to be like oooohh my god im so obssesed lol what does anyone else think about all this spoiler thing!.!.!.!.!.!.!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
I kind of doubt that River Song has been telling the Doctor the truth!. I think she might be a 51st century con-artist, like Captain Jack was when the Doctor first met him, except that she is an archaeologist!. So she could have found that book with all the information about the Doctor's past and future in it at an archaeological dig somewhere (the Doctor having written and lost it in his future, but in her past), and be using the information in it to con him into thinking she knows his future self!.
The only other real alternative, is that she genuinely is a future companion of the Doctor, but I can't see the situation being as simple as that!. Anyway, I have no doubt that we will find out in the next episode!.
I wouldn't take much notice of the YouTube video if I were you!. I've seen that, and it's just a fan made video which has nothing to do with the on-going plot or canon of Doctor Who on TV!.
There are lots of fan made videos on YouTube about Doctor Who, which are just made up by fans from their own imagination!. They are just meant to be a bit of fun and are not to be taken seriously!. So you shouldn't really believe anything you see on the Internet about Doctor Who unless it either comes from a reliable source, or has convincing evidence (such as photographs taken during filming) to back it up!.
If you want some real background information on the time war, based on what Russel!. T Davies has written or said, and on previous events in Doctor Who - have a look at these links!.
http://en!.wikipedia!.org/wiki/Time_War_(D!.!.!.
http://www!.historyvortex!.org/HistoryTime!.!.!.
http://forums!.scifi!.com/index!.php!?s=0716!.!.!.
(this last link is to a thread on Doctor Who fan forum, but it includes a copy of a transcript of events in the Time War, written by Russel!. T Davies for Doctor Who Magazine - I know it's real because I remember reading it when it came out a couple of years ago)!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
The only other real alternative, is that she genuinely is a future companion of the Doctor, but I can't see the situation being as simple as that!. Anyway, I have no doubt that we will find out in the next episode!.
I wouldn't take much notice of the YouTube video if I were you!. I've seen that, and it's just a fan made video which has nothing to do with the on-going plot or canon of Doctor Who on TV!.
There are lots of fan made videos on YouTube about Doctor Who, which are just made up by fans from their own imagination!. They are just meant to be a bit of fun and are not to be taken seriously!. So you shouldn't really believe anything you see on the Internet about Doctor Who unless it either comes from a reliable source, or has convincing evidence (such as photographs taken during filming) to back it up!.
If you want some real background information on the time war, based on what Russel!. T Davies has written or said, and on previous events in Doctor Who - have a look at these links!.
http://en!.wikipedia!.org/wiki/Time_War_(D!.!.!.
http://www!.historyvortex!.org/HistoryTime!.!.!.
http://forums!.scifi!.com/index!.php!?s=0716!.!.!.
(this last link is to a thread on Doctor Who fan forum, but it includes a copy of a transcript of events in the Time War, written by Russel!. T Davies for Doctor Who Magazine - I know it's real because I remember reading it when it came out a couple of years ago)!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
I think she behaves awfully familiar with the Doctor, and when she calls him "sweetie", I thought "Mother!?", but then she said she's never seen him so young, so I'm guessing "lover" or "wife"!. Not plain companion, because she seems too proprietary over the Doctor!.Www@Enter-QA@Com