How do you DEFINE THE WORD.........?!
Question: How do you DEFINE THE WORD!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!?
evil!?
many people have vastly different definitions of it, what is yours!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
many people have vastly different definitions of it, what is yours!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
A pedophile!.!.!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Plato, argued that which we call evil is merely ignorance and that good
is that which everyone desires!.
Benedict de Spinoza: said that the difference between good and evil is merely one of personal inclinations:"So everyone by the highest right of
Nature, judges what is good and what is evil, considers his own advantage according to his own temperament!.
A fundamental question is whether there is a universal transcendent defination of evil or whether evil is determined by one's social or cultural background!.
C!.S!.Lewis, in The Abolition of Man, maintained that there are certain
acts that are universally considered evil, such as rape and murder!. On the other hand it is haard to find any act that was not acceptaable in some society!. Less than 150 years ago the United States of America and many other countries practiced brutal forms of slavery!.
Vies on the nature of evil tend to fall into one of two opposed camps!.One, moral absolutism, holds that good and evil are fixed concepts established by god, nature, morality, common sense, or
some other source!. The other, moral relativism, holds that standards
of good and evil are only products of local culture, custom, or prejudice
Moral universalism is the attempt to find a compromise between absolutist sense of morality, and the relativist view!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
is that which everyone desires!.
Benedict de Spinoza: said that the difference between good and evil is merely one of personal inclinations:"So everyone by the highest right of
Nature, judges what is good and what is evil, considers his own advantage according to his own temperament!.
A fundamental question is whether there is a universal transcendent defination of evil or whether evil is determined by one's social or cultural background!.
C!.S!.Lewis, in The Abolition of Man, maintained that there are certain
acts that are universally considered evil, such as rape and murder!. On the other hand it is haard to find any act that was not acceptaable in some society!. Less than 150 years ago the United States of America and many other countries practiced brutal forms of slavery!.
Vies on the nature of evil tend to fall into one of two opposed camps!.One, moral absolutism, holds that good and evil are fixed concepts established by god, nature, morality, common sense, or
some other source!. The other, moral relativism, holds that standards
of good and evil are only products of local culture, custom, or prejudice
Moral universalism is the attempt to find a compromise between absolutist sense of morality, and the relativist view!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
hi eye of ;-)
personally i use to to describe a person who does an unspeakable thing, soemthing horrific, i will say thats evil,
but
i dont believe them to be "evil" because i dont believe in evil
i believe in biology, and psychology, experience and cause and effect
and thats just life
its not evil or good, its just life
evil is just the word we use to describe some of the more horrible dark aspects of life and people
i accept that even the most heinous of things done by people can have the most rational explanations, ie brain tumour in their social cortex, and or severe childhood psychological abuse etc
these often produce people who woudl be described as "evil"
but i never see them as the same way soceity does, i see what causd them to do these things tooWww@Enter-QA@Com
personally i use to to describe a person who does an unspeakable thing, soemthing horrific, i will say thats evil,
but
i dont believe them to be "evil" because i dont believe in evil
i believe in biology, and psychology, experience and cause and effect
and thats just life
its not evil or good, its just life
evil is just the word we use to describe some of the more horrible dark aspects of life and people
i accept that even the most heinous of things done by people can have the most rational explanations, ie brain tumour in their social cortex, and or severe childhood psychological abuse etc
these often produce people who woudl be described as "evil"
but i never see them as the same way soceity does, i see what causd them to do these things tooWww@Enter-QA@Com
EVIL: Someone who does something that society as a whole considers wrong (murder, drunk driver and has an accident and hurts someone, sexual predators, etc!.) and has no remorse!.
Hugs Tiger,
SusieWww@Enter-QA@Com
Hugs Tiger,
SusieWww@Enter-QA@Com
Evil: I would have to say someone who is a pathological liar; someone who strings you along in their fake life !.!.!.!. someone who when times get rough - will take your personal secrets or painful experiences and through them back at you, say during an argument !.!.!.
Wait !.!.!. Ill Edit !.!.!. Www@Enter-QA@Com
Wait !.!.!. Ill Edit !.!.!. Www@Enter-QA@Com
someone with know empathy, compassion or conscience!. If you are lacking these characteristics you are capable of unspeakable things!.!. You have no boundaries!. You are missing what makes us human!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Hate, murder, rape, molestationWww@Enter-QA@Com
Something bad in a very specific and and appropriate way to a determined situation!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
morbid, unholy, mean, no concious, and vile!.!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
spell it backwards and it spells live!
Which in my words means
You have to be evil ONCE ion your life to live!Www@Enter-QA@Com
Which in my words means
You have to be evil ONCE ion your life to live!Www@Enter-QA@Com
i don't believe in "evil", so i don't really have one!. Www@Enter-QA@Com
satanWww@Enter-QA@Com
Evil, it's a four letter word!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
one who harms or hurts others and does not find anything wrong with what they did! Www@Enter-QA@Com
Uhh that's a hard one!.!.!.!.!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
same one whos is = to satanWww@Enter-QA@Com
me; myself; && iWww@Enter-QA@Com
my ex boyfriendWww@Enter-QA@Com