In the interest of equality should we rename manholes "personholes"?!
Question: In the interest of equality should we rename manholes "personholes"!?
Any other gender would just be wrong on so many levels!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
Yes, once we've been renamed from mankind to personkind!. And when cameras don't came with manuals, but with personuals!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
I mean, things were specifically named in the olden days because of the supreme men power!.
But nowadays, it doesn't really matter!. Why should we go on changing every single thing that has the word man in it and was used centuries before we even lived and sexism even existed!? It's crazy, no, it's fine to leave it!.
--MissaWww@Enter-QA@Com
But nowadays, it doesn't really matter!. Why should we go on changing every single thing that has the word man in it and was used centuries before we even lived and sexism even existed!? It's crazy, no, it's fine to leave it!.
--MissaWww@Enter-QA@Com
hah, that's just like at my school, our mascot is the Pine Bush Bushman, and some people say we should change it to Pine Bush Aliens cuz we're a big UFO hotspot, dont believe me!? google it then!Www@Enter-QA@Com
Actually I think somebody should come up with another word besides "person" that indicates an individual without reference to gender, and a pronoun also!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
This level of equality is what is technically called 'hogswash'!.
Would you call mothers 'parentpersons' because 'mother' gives an idea of being female!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
Would you call mothers 'parentpersons' because 'mother' gives an idea of being female!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
definitely
and at the post office, the post-person, and the mail-person!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
and at the post office, the post-person, and the mail-person!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
That's taking "political correctness" to a new level! I see what you mean, though, by any other gender!. Let's just keep man holes and leave it at that! (Whew! )Www@Enter-QA@Com
No reather rename it freesebee!.!./!.!. Have good day!.!.!.!.!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Yes, it could start up a whole new industry in person-hole covers!. Invest now!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
no
it's not offensive in anywayWww@Enter-QA@Com
it's not offensive in anywayWww@Enter-QA@Com
i think its jus call "man"holes cuz it cul be *man* or wo*man*!.!.!.the man part is just in both termsWww@Enter-QA@Com
I'm not opfended!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
yesWww@Enter-QA@Com
I've yet to see a woman lay one!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Yes! I agree!.!.!.!.they should be called!.!.!.!.let me think!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.I'll get back to you on it!Www@Enter-QA@Com
this is the strangest question I've ever seen! LOL!Www@Enter-QA@Com