Is it really better to "have loved and lost than to have never loved at all!
Question: What's your take on it?
Answers: What's your take on it?
I know someone who's never been in love---and she's not nice at all!
It's hard to say, because if you've never loved, you don't know what you are missing, but when you find love, the fear of losing it sucks.
Yes - but it sure hurts like hell!!
if you never loved at all then you never get hurt
totally its better to have had a love and the feeling of love than to never have the feeling of love at all
well, have you ever been in love? if you have then you will understand if i said better not to love.
The only people who say "it is better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all" either...
a) have never been in love.
or
b) are in love and are currently with the one they love.
It is not better.
Having lost love leaves a hole that can never be filled.
Never having loved leaves a question, in that they wonder what it's like to be in love. That leaves them with hope that they may one day find it.
it better to be loved and have love than to never experience loving at all.................
atLeast you have experience........^.~
So, Is that why I'm contemplating suicide?
I don't know buddy. My gal is always so busy, she rarely has time for me. I love her alot. I'm thinking right now that after Christmas I am going to call it quits. I have many lost loves that I think about from time to time, but some of them i wish I had never loved at all.
This is just a stupid saying that people tell other people to try and make them feel better. I have loved and lost and it was probably the single most painful thing I have ever went through. If i had the chance to do over again I wouldn't even have fooled with it. But I guess its the manner in which your love is lost also. So in fact i don't know anything lol.
no, not a bit.
yes, even it's hurt, lost love(s) always taught us something - and probably make us wiser.
yeah