Who should be given more credit... (more)?!
Question: Who should be given more credit!.!.!. (more)!?
A musician whose talent is amazingly natural
or
A musician whose talent is "acquired" through years of bloody effort!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
or
A musician whose talent is "acquired" through years of bloody effort!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
well!.!.!.depends really!.
A local band here!.!. not worht mentioning!.!.the guitarist went to school to learn his techniques and shreddn' skillz, then later acts liek he's the shiiiit and what not, and brags bcuz he went to school to learn how to "be good"!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
you also can't blame or hate on someone for being natrually amazing!. It's in their blood!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
A local band here!.!. not worht mentioning!.!.the guitarist went to school to learn his techniques and shreddn' skillz, then later acts liek he's the shiiiit and what not, and brags bcuz he went to school to learn how to "be good"!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
you also can't blame or hate on someone for being natrually amazing!. It's in their blood!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
I'd give credit to the one who "acquired" his talent because as most said work is a b*tch, lmao!!
also, the naturally talented one can get cocky and arrogent which sux and no one likes that!Www@Enter-QA@Com
also, the naturally talented one can get cocky and arrogent which sux and no one likes that!Www@Enter-QA@Com
Acuired talent!. Means they worked hard and will keep working hard to improve, and thats better than natural talent IMO!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
A musician whose talent is "acquired" through years of bloody effort should have all the credit!. Work is a Bitc* but it pays at the end!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
both!. but i think natural talent is more awe inspiring, and hard work is more inspirational to do my own work!. if that makes any senseWww@Enter-QA@Com
Both deserve credit!. I can't choose one over the other!. Honestly!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
i say both are equal none of them should get more credit then the otherWww@Enter-QA@Com