U2 or The Beatles: Which band do you prefer?!


Question: U2 or The Beatles: Which band do you prefer!?
why!?Www@Enter-QA@Com


Answers:
U2 is better compared to another low 2nd-high 3rd teir band, they really dont belong in a conversation with the beatles!. they had some good moments!. i never found anything they did to be particularly interesting musically, but some of the songs are pretty good for what they are!. meanwhile, from the point the beatles stopped touring on they were one of the greatest album producing units that popular music has ever seen!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

The Beatles because well aside from having two brilliant song writers Lennon and McCartney!. They have written some of the most beautiful touching music I have ever heard!. Their voices beautiful and unique as they were!. Their music defined a generation they started the movement for peace and cared about others!. They are simply brilliant and epic in every sense of the word!.

@ Dima B You are a moron who fails at life and you would not know real music if it bit you on the ***!. Both The Beatles and U2 are amazing bands who did a lot for not just rock but music in general and if you don't respect them and don't appreciate their contributions to music and life!. Then all I have to say is for you to get the **** out here and fast you dumbass idiot!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

I would go with the Beatles because of their innovations and styling (in perspective of their time)
U2 is probably a better music overall, but the only song that stands out from them to me is the main hit from Josua Tree!. (can't find what I am looking for!.!.!.)
The Beatles have many songs that stand out!. I love Hey Jude, Sgt!. Peppers, Hard Days Night, and many others!.

But musically, I take 80's country and rockWww@Enter-QA@Com

Beatles had a better marketing machine than U2!.
Beatles was in a different era than U2!.
Beatles Members engaged in variety of different musical endeavours!. Did not notice that about U2!.
Beatles -- English, U2 -- Irish!.

My Vote!.!. Nah, can't compare, sorry!. Like some of both!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Hard Question 'cause I like them both!. Have to go with the Fab Four though for the variety of their music!. U2 has one lead singer, the Beatles four!.
Then there is just the fact that the Beatles historically deserve our accolades!. U2 deserves our support in so many of their causes!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

U2 is in heavier rotation, so I'm going to vote for them!.

Beatles were great, don't get me wrong, and I have a few of their albums that I really, really like, but!.!.!.!. it's like reminiscence time or listening to oldies or reliving my youth or something like that when I listen to them!. They're not the ones who *really* speak to me now!. And U2 does!. Maybe I'll feel the same way about them in another 30 years!.!.!.!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

For me this is easy!. Beatles anyday!. I like U2 but they just aren't the legends that the Beatles were!. Regardless of the fact that the Beatles were milked to the greatest extent possible they still were absolutely amazing musicians!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

they are both down in history and i luvv bono but the BEATLES definately!! they are ROCK LEGENDS man!!! <3 ily Beatles- john lennon, paul mcartney, ringo star, and georgie porgie!! tee hee hee ok well beatles rock they are probably the most famous band like evr!!!! they started it all ;] ? peace Www@Enter-QA@Com

wow!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.backstreet boys and n'sync suck!!!!!!!!! and id rather have U2!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.not really a big beatles fan!.!.!.!.!.!.my mom is though!. i think U2 has better songs that beatles!.!.!.!.but then again i really dont listen to either of them that much!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

I love them both but the Beatles came first and they will always be my first love of music!. It is difficult to find a truly awful song in either of their catalogs!.!.!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

U2 are great rock innovators, but The Beatles are musical legends!.



Tough to say which had more influence though!. Without The Beatles, there would have been no U2!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

i would say the beatles, but u2 had some great songs!. i love their early stuff, but their most recent cd is terrible, thats why i pick the beatles!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

U2 is horrid and very overrated!. Bono's also a preachy douchebag!. Beatles for sure!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

I like them both alot, but I think I would have to go with The Beatles, if i had to choose!. Hey Jude is the best!! ^_^Www@Enter-QA@Com

after i saw Bono in Across the Universe!.!.!.!. i hate him now!.
it sounded like he said 'coo coo kachoo' it pissed me off!. thats not even how the lyrics go!!
BEATLES!!!!!Www@Enter-QA@Com

U2 by Tons!.

Wow Dima, I finally met Someone stupider than Paris Hilton, Kool!Www@Enter-QA@Com

Beatles!.!. i just prefer their music!. But i do admire Paul Hewson(bono) a lot!. Www@Enter-QA@Com

The Beatles!!!

PS: Preachy Douchebag has tears rolling down my face from laughter!!!Www@Enter-QA@Com

The Beatles!Www@Enter-QA@Com

The Beatles! Www@Enter-QA@Com

This can't be a serious question!. The Beatles!. Www@Enter-QA@Com

The Beatles

Screw you Dima B!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

The Beatles! Bono sucks!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

I agree with Khat, sumed up my feelings perfectly!Www@Enter-QA@Com

both are garbage!.!.they use instruments to cover up their bad voices!.!.Backstreet Boys and N'sync are way better!Www@Enter-QA@Com



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories