Who has more talented Members, Pink Floyd, or The Beatles...?!?!


Question: Who has more talented Members, Pink Floyd, or The Beatles!.!.!.!?!!?
!.!.I DONT mean who made better music, I just mean, which had more Talent!?

If you compare their musicians together, which band has more raw talent!?

My opinion, is Pink Floyd, had more talented members than the beatles, but i think the beatles just clicked together thats why they made such grreat music!

dont get me wrong i think floyd did to, but not as good as the bealtes, in my opinion!
Www@Enter-QA@Com


Answers:
Both have first place in musical history!. The Beatles started a whole new rock!. Different from anything we had heard before!. Pink Floyd was ahead of their time and created timeless music!. I can't pick one over the other without discrediting genius on one side or the other!. I am partial to the Beatles, but both groups had original ideas and were very, very talented!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Pink Floyd had more talent than the Beatles!.

Lennon was a genius and george harrison was the most talented out of the beatles!.

Pink Floyd had one of the greatest musicians ever!. Syd Barret!. Syd released two solo albums that are pure geniusand Syd also made Pink Floyd stand out in the public and now they are one of the most liked bands!. They had a great guitarist in david gilmore and had better song writing than the beatles!. Pink Floyd is a better band than the beatles!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Well!.!.!.

George Harrison and John Lennon were both INCREDIBLY talented in that they were able to pursue successful solo careers!.

Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr were amazing contributions to the band, but weren't really all that great solo!.

The Beatles had better music, Floyd had more talent!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Im a huge pink floyd fan, and dont really care much for the Beatles!.
its hands down the Beatles though!. pink floyd play the music they play because they wernt good enough to play the kind of stuff that was popular at the time, so they formed there own style!. which they became really good at!. but the Beatles are more talented though!.
Its all really preference though!. hope i helped!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

That is the problem with our culture and art!. We compare and compete!. Just think of all the great art and music which is not seen or heard because of this kind of comparison and competition!. What they all gave was from their deepest selves!. It was and is beautiful!. Isn't that enough!?Www@Enter-QA@Com

I cant really say right now!. I love the beatles but with Rick Wright's recent passing, i just dont feel comfortable saying i like the beatles better!. Both contributed a lot to Classic rock!. And are completely distinct!. May their deceased members rests in peace!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

I'd say The Who!. I know they aren't one of the two choices but Keith Moon was one hell of a drummer and could play the hell out of a set (or blow one up!.lol!.) also they had John Entwistle, which in my opinion, was, and still is even after his death, the best rock bass player ever born!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

maybe my 2 favorite bands, so i am not biased one way or the other!. i think the beatles had more talent, 3 amazing songwriters, all could sing and they often played each others' instruments!. in terms of technical skill, pink floyd wins easily!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

C'mon Doc! That is comparing apples to oranges!

They both left musical legacies that will never be matched again!. The Beatles were a superb pop band, but Pink Floyd was a thinking man's rock band!.

How could anyone possibly choose who was better!?Www@Enter-QA@Com

Floyd!. Both bands, like many such as Steely Dan, Roxy Music, etc, clicked due to synergy, but Floyd's individual prowess topped the Baeatles!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

This is all a matter of Opinion!. I would choose Pink Floyd just because i'm more of a fan!. They were all incredibly talented so this is a tough choice for sure!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

hahahahaha,no no i think the beatles invented it but pink floyd was like the little brother somehow!.
there is a band called legendary pink dots!.very much like floyd,
more like their weird cousin!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Pink Floyd probably had more talent!. The Beatles were magical together, which is why most of each member's solo music has something missing in it!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

The Beatles! Pink Floyd were good but weren't that skilled musicians in my opinion!. also most of the beatles were able to hold up steady solo careers!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Paul McCartney put out at least one album where he played every instrument on every song!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Floyd
It's a difficult choice!.
I've never bought a Beatles album, though I respect their contributions!.
I've bought tons of Floyd stuff!.
I'm biased!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Pink Floyd although the beatles were still amazing!Www@Enter-QA@Com

The Beatles, always>>>>>>!Www@Enter-QA@Com

Pink Floyd were much better players than the Beatles!.

I'm votin' Pink Floyd!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Pink FloydWww@Enter-QA@Com

Uh!.!.oh!.!.!.that question just isn't fair!! (lol)Www@Enter-QA@Com



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories