Better vocalist: John Lennon or Billy Corgan?!


Question: Better vocalist: John Lennon or Billy Corgan!?
In your opinionWww@Enter-QA@Com


Answers:
John Lennons great, but so is Billy!.

'Imagine', Johns voice is really calming!. But i love nearly all the Smashing Pumpkins songs!. Im going to have to say Billy!Www@Enter-QA@Com

I love both of them!.

And I'm having trouble comparing the two--they sound nothing alike to me, opposite ends of the rock spectrum as far as vocals go!. This decision isn't really as easy as pitting Jagger's vocals against Steven Tyler's!.

So I consider both among my favorites--in both vocals, talent, and meaning (as far as songs go)--but in completely different ways!.

Though, if I were to make a decision, I would probably go with Lennon as he was in "Happiness is a Warm Gun"!. EDIT: Actually!.!.!."Don't Let Me Down" may be the best example of Lennon's vocal talents!. As far as I can think of at least!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

They both suck!. I think most of you answering this question are really saying "I like John Lennon and the Smashing Pumpkins suck!." I agree!. But serioulsly, Lennon was a terrible singer and could not carry a tune at all!. Corgan's voice is annoying as hell, but he could still "sing" better!. Www@Enter-QA@Com

Lennon!. No contest!. He was so unimaginably innovative and unique and talented and brilliant that no one could compare to him!. I'm not a huge Pumpkins fan and I understand, Corgan was an influence on alternative music but, he's just not comparable to John Lennon!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

how can you try to me make compare these two!?!!?!
they are completely different, i dont want to place one higher than the other!.
john lennon changed music in the earlier days!.
billy corgan changed music in more recent times!.
don't make me pick!.!.!. :'[

but i like your question anyways ;]Www@Enter-QA@Com

hmm!.!.!. as a huge fan of both the beatles and the smashing pumpkins, i don't think there is a better singer!. the better overall musician would be john but their sounds are too different to compare!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

John!.
As a follow-up to what Cold Roses said, John Lennon, who's been dead for almost 30 years, STILL sounds better today then Billy Corgan could ever even dream of sounding!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

this one's another laugher

billy corgan doesn't deserve to go within 100 miles of john lennon's graveWww@Enter-QA@Com

Billy Corgan!.
Because I prefer his weird nasally voice to John!. It's Just wonderful!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

John Lennon

his voice is so unique and beautiful, i can't explain!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

John Lennon

I don't even like The Beatles but Lennon and Corgan don't belong in the same sentence!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Billy Corgan!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Mr!. Lennon!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Haha, Cold Roses' answer is funny!. But I much prefer Corgan!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

John Lennon with the flu would still be better than Billy Corgan!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

John Lennon no question!.
Www@Enter-QA@Com

John Lennon =) billy's voice is annoying after a whileWww@Enter-QA@Com

John Lennon all day, everyday!. Not even a fair fight!. Www@Enter-QA@Com

They're both good, but i have to say John Lennon!. I like his voice!. Www@Enter-QA@Com

John LennonWww@Enter-QA@Com



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories