Is it alright???!


Question: Is it alright!?!?!?
to like Katherine Jenkins and dislike Sarah Brightman!?
I have no idea about vocal training or anything like that, so maybe Sarah Brightman is technically better or something, but I just prefer Jenkins' voice to listen to!.Www@Enter-QA@Com


Answers:
Well, yes it's ok!. However, if Jenkins looked like te back of a bus she wouldn't be half as successful!.

What is amazing about Sarah is that she has two voices, really!. She can produce a pop, contemporary sound, but she can also blossom out into a light soprano!. The soprano part of her voice can go up to an E natural above high C!. She doesn’t sing it full out, but it is there!. Of course, she has to dance while she is singing some of the time, so it’s all the more extraordinary!.

She sometimes deploys both her pop and classical voices in the same song!. One example is "Anytime, Anywhere" from Eden, a song based on Tomaso Albinoni's Adagio in G minor!. In the song, she starts out in classical voice, switches to pop voice temporarily, and finishes with her classical voice!.

Brightman's music is generally classified as classical crossover!.

Katherine Jenkins wants to responding to people's increasing boredom with pop music and I'm sure you'll agree that she does!. But Katherine Jenkins says she also wants to be respected by people who are already lovers of classical music and I feel that this is something she doesn't do!. while Katherine Jenkins' voice is gentle and wholesome, it's also heavily produced and we don't hear any variety in tone!. So, she's great for getting people into classical music because of her warming voice - maybe this is why you prefer her!?

You say you have no idea about vocal training, which is fair enough!. So, from this perspective, I can tell you that Jenkins would not be considered a virtuoso whereas Brightman would!.

Interesting question!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

U r perfectly rightWww@Enter-QA@Com

yup it's ok =)Www@Enter-QA@Com

I'd definitely go for SARAH Brightman, i love her version of "dust in the wind"

on the other hand, I don't know who the ***** is Katherine JenkinsWww@Enter-QA@Com

Sarah Brightman's "pop" sound is often difficult to listen to because she too properly trained and is unable to produce the "pop" sound quality convincingly!. As for if it's okay to have music preferences, that's part of the reason people love music: it is expression!. I HATE Picasso (later Picasso-the early stuff was okay) with the burning passion of ten thousand suns, but I love Dali!. The fun of music and art is that you can make your own decisions because there's no mathematical absolutes in the sound/image!. Yes, they make play a part in both, but that's not what the average person sees or hears!. So, enjoy what you'd like, and don't let anyone tell you that you are wrong!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Of course you are entitled to your own opinion!. Not every artist can perform "every" song better than any one else!. That is where the coined phrase,"signature song" comes in!.
Sometimes, when I am writing, I will know in advance which actor I want for the part and I tailor it to fit them!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Do as you wish!. Neither should really be in the classical music forum!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

I'm sure it's always okay to like whatever sounds good to you whether their technique is flawless or crap!. :)Www@Enter-QA@Com

Completely okay! Katherine sounds okay but Sarah has drifted far too far away from her best days!!Www@Enter-QA@Com

Do you mean all right!? 2 words never 1!. Sarah is much better and not technically!. Just better!.Www@Enter-QA@Com



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories