To be considered "music", must a work have melody, tone, rhythm, etc?!
Question: Consider works by Xeankis or Tangerine Dream. Would you say that all their works can be called music? Or does it sometimes go beyond the definition of what we know as music?
Some artists experiment with "found sounds" and come up with things that are highly abstract. Is that music?
Answers: Consider works by Xeankis or Tangerine Dream. Would you say that all their works can be called music? Or does it sometimes go beyond the definition of what we know as music?
Some artists experiment with "found sounds" and come up with things that are highly abstract. Is that music?
is there noise involved? then its music.
fhfdshb tfgagvb fn fm,gv dfbv
yes
Music has to only have one thing to be called "music" and that my friend is called "rhythm". Without rhythm, people can not follow along and enjoy the work. Without some form of rhythm, it is just an artistic expression of sounds.
No, melody is not necessarily needed.
Yes, to your first question.
Not for me, response to your last one.
For me, they must not only have melody and rhythm, but must also engage the intellect as well as the ear; and not burst your ear-drums, nor make you want to climb the walls to get away: which is what most so-called "modern music" does to me.
Alberich