Do you think the Mick Jagger is underrated as a solo artist?!
Question: *I'm stricking a pose and strutting as I ask this question*
Answers: *I'm stricking a pose and strutting as I ask this question*
I must be honest, he is horrid. As someone who has seen the Rolling Stones in concert, I can say he is an extremely good front man... and that's the extent of it. Without the rest of the Stones he is but a pebble in the world of rock.
and "rock"... can't forget that.
ROCK! Report It
* You must be logged into Answers to add comments. Sign in or Register.
Other Answers (0)
="shown">
by anti_pop... - Member since:
- August 23, 2007
- Total points:
- 5873 (Level 5)
="network">
i can't watch mick jagger preform.. something about him just bothers me..
i have nothing against the rolling stone's music.. and haven't bothered to listen to any of his solo junk.. but i just can't stand mick jagger..
Yes
JK...lol...I dislike him
LOL. *striking a pose back*...Love him! But I think he's an awesome performer... don't know about solo artist.
No he is not under rated as a solo artist. Without prior recognition/reputation as a Stone, his garbage wouldn't get a second listen. Maybe not even a first listen. If he were to attempt to break into the business today, without ever having fronted the greatest band in the world, he wouldn't make it...would not get his foot in the door on his own merit or on the strength of his songs alone.
All time greatest front man though....a real bad *** with the Stones.
I think, besides Dylan and Hendrix, he is the most OVERRATED singer of ALL TIME! He has no range at all.
no, he is better with the band his solo stuff would not even have a chance if it was not for the stones
i have nothing against the rolling stone's music.. and haven't bothered to listen to any of his solo junk.. but i just can't stand mick jagger..
Yes
JK...lol...I dislike him
LOL. *striking a pose back*...Love him! But I think he's an awesome performer... don't know about solo artist.
No he is not under rated as a solo artist. Without prior recognition/reputation as a Stone, his garbage wouldn't get a second listen. Maybe not even a first listen. If he were to attempt to break into the business today, without ever having fronted the greatest band in the world, he wouldn't make it...would not get his foot in the door on his own merit or on the strength of his songs alone.
All time greatest front man though....a real bad *** with the Stones.
I think, besides Dylan and Hendrix, he is the most OVERRATED singer of ALL TIME! He has no range at all.
no, he is better with the band his solo stuff would not even have a chance if it was not for the stones
The answer content post by the user,
if contains the copyright content please contact us,
we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com - Contact us