Was anyone angry about the dark knight not...!
Question: Was anyone angry about the dark knight not!.!.!.
about not having katie holmes as rachel again!? grrrrrrrrWww@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
really they can take her out and replace her with anybody scary and she just wasn't scary in the first movie!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
To be honest I don't go to movies to watch actors, I go over the story!. Didn't make any difference to me!. I mean I could see complaining if she had been that much better at the role, or even better, but seriously if you want to go just to watch Katie Holmes then don't go!. I don't think she was BAD in Batman Begins, but it wasn't like she was so great!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
I preferred Katie over Maggie G!. in the acting and looks dept!. However, it was Katie's fault!. She was apparently not flexible enough with her schedule to make the shooting of the movie possible for her, so they went with Maggie Gyllenhall!. I think since she hooked up with Tom Cruise and the Scientology crew, she's too "important" to have to be flexible!. !. !. !. !. !.Www@Enter-QA@Com
She can't act so this was an improvement!. But you thought she did great so I guess you're hoping Paris Hilton gets another role too!. Wow, even people who don't know anything about acting thought she was embarrassingly bad in Batman Begins!. If "great" acting means reciting your lines in a dull monotone without any emotion or emphasis, then you must love zombie flicks!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
She was HORRIBLY miscast in the first movie!. Taking her out was the best decision Christopher Nolan made, other than to cast Heath Ledger as the Joker!.
Katie Holmes will always, always, always be "Joey"!. Www@Enter-QA@Com
Katie Holmes will always, always, always be "Joey"!. Www@Enter-QA@Com
Well not Nolan's fault!. Katie Holmes said she is not comfortable playing as Rachael in The Dark knight due to her love for Tom Cruise!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
No I wasn't angry!. It really didn't bug me!.Www@Enter-QA@Com