Dark Knight question???!
Question: Dark Knight question!?!?!?
Who thinks they shouldve gotten a more attractive actress to play Rachel!? The actress who played her was!.!.!.well, fugly, to be honestWww@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
I know! I was watching the movie and I was like "Wait, that's the girl that they're fighting over!!?" She must have been good in bed because the guy with the cleft chin (Dent was his name, right!?) would NOT give up on her and it definitely wasn't her looks or personality that would have attracted him!.
Oh yeah! The joker "you sure are beautiful" thing was funny!. He must have had make-up in his eyes!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Oh yeah! The joker "you sure are beautiful" thing was funny!. He must have had make-up in his eyes!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
i agree; i felt that at least maggie gyllenhaal had a personality, which was definitely a change from katie holmes!. i think her performance was good!. as for her appearance!.!. it doesn't make that much of a difference to me as long as the acting was believable!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
PEOPLE, PLEASE GO AND SEE THE DARK NIGHT AT LEAST 3 OR 4 MORE TIMES WHILE IT IS IN THEATERS I HAVE SEEN IT 3 TIMES ALREADY AND IMMA GO BACK AGAIN IT NEEDS TO BE THE HIGHEST GROSSING MOVIE OF ALL TIME!. (TITANIC IS THE CURRENT)
THE RECENT NEWS IS IT RAKES IN:
$ 314,000,000 IN ONLY 10 DAYSWww@Enter-QA@Com
THE RECENT NEWS IS IT RAKES IN:
$ 314,000,000 IN ONLY 10 DAYSWww@Enter-QA@Com
uh superficiality!. who cares if you think she was ugly!. the directors know better than you do, and they apparently thought she was the right actress for the job, but i agree with the person who said that she acted better than Katie HolmesWww@Enter-QA@Com
She is no uglier than Ms!. Cruise, and Maggie Gyllenhaal is a fantastic actress, unlike the previous!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
yes she was!!! idk why they didnt!.!. i saw it 4 times and i thought it was AMAZING but ur rite the actress that played rachel was not the best pick if you ask me!.!.!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Sometimes Acting Skills are more important than looks, and Maggie Gyllenhall is sooooo much better than Katie Holmes, and I think she is pretty good lookingWww@Enter-QA@Com
acting aside, someone prettier would've made it better
on the upside she did die
and ledger got to kiss another gyllenhal (sp!?)Www@Enter-QA@Com
on the upside she did die
and ledger got to kiss another gyllenhal (sp!?)Www@Enter-QA@Com
Sure, not the most attractive woman, but she played the part very well!. And she isn't THAT ugly!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
she's actually not that bad, i could admit there were many other prettier women who could've replaced her, but she was descent!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
whaaat!? are you stoooopid!? shes naturally gorgeous!. oh sorry is she not anorexic enough for you!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
yeah they should have used like eva longoria or someone else more attractive!. I hate that ugly girl!. she was ugly in stranger than fiction too!. who would've thought!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
omg! i was thinking that too! when the joker was talking about how beautiful she was i was like is he seeing something that im not!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
maggie gylennhal (Sp!?) is not fugly!.
i thought she played the part wonderflyWww@Enter-QA@Com
i thought she played the part wonderflyWww@Enter-QA@Com
I thought she was a WAY better actress than Katie Holmes!. And the acting is what counts!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
she played a better rachel than katie holmesWww@Enter-QA@Com
They should have got Katie Holmes to play her she did a great job in batman begins!. But i think Maggie did a semi good jobWww@Enter-QA@Com
yeah, but she did alright as that part so it wasnt SO terrible that she was kinda ugly!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Why does she have to be attractive!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
she is an ok actress but they prob!. could of gotten someone betterWww@Enter-QA@Com
I agree 100%Www@Enter-QA@Com
she was fugly i agreeWww@Enter-QA@Com
i agree!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
yeah i liked the other girl better!. she she as a really good actress tooWww@Enter-QA@Com