The Dark Knight question/opinion: SPOILERS INSIDE!!!!! YOU'VE BEEN WARRRNED?!
Question: The Dark Knight question/opinion: SPOILERS INSIDE!!!!! YOU'VE BEEN WARRRNED!?
Alright so it's in my personal opinion that Katie Holmes didn't take up the part of Rachel in "The Dark Knight" because she knew the character gets killed!. I know some actors will refuse to play roles in which they have to die in the movie!. And Katie Holmes seems like that kinda weirdo!. Does anyone else agree!? Is their any proof/evidence to help or dissuade my theory!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
i wish she would've been in TDK!.
maggie didnt really do it for me!.
she reminds me of a sad cartoon turtle!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
maggie didnt really do it for me!.
she reminds me of a sad cartoon turtle!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
i didn't personally think that katie holmes was that great!.!.!. she had too much of a "sweet" girl look about her!. sure gyllenhal isn't that attractive but i think she played the role with more competence than holmes and better reflects the character of dawes even though holmes originated the character!. not only that but her portrayal works much better for the mood and tone of the film, and would have for batman begins as well!.!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Katie was offered [Dark Knight], but was unable to accept the role because of scheduling conflicts!. She was in the process of negotiating for another project!. In addition, when she returns to work, she would like to tackle a new character!."Www@Enter-QA@Com
No she just didn't do it because of her schedule!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
i agree, maybe too long with tom cruise made her a little weird!?, ive always enjoyed tom cruizes movies though, yeah i thought it was sposed ta b katie holmesWww@Enter-QA@Com
in my opinion she wanted to do a comedy instead, so she went with the movie Mad Money because she thought it would be more fun!.Www@Enter-QA@Com