A little help from my Bava Loyalist & Mystmoonstruck: Plagiarism in the horrorfi!


Question: A little help from my Bava Loyalist & Mystmoonstruck: Plagiarism in the horrorfilms!?
1!. why the producers love to make the same plots over and over !?
2!. why the producers love to steal the scripts from the oldies (for instance 1967 and 1973 or 1985)!?
the new remakes of The Wicker Man 2005, Silent Night Bloody Night and Black Christmas 2006 as good examples, but no former stars from the original film 1974 wante dto comment about it!. Neither did Olivia Hussey and Margot Kidder (Black XMas 1974) & neither does Christopher Lee (the original Wicker Man 1973)

Is it not hurting a copyright of the oldies!?

Important news:

I′d got a signature from Lamberto Bava (the famous son of Grande MARIO GIALLO PAPA BAVA) in Rome 2000 during my european student-days and the summer Giallo oldies filmfestival!. I′d talked too much with him about " the possibility of the making of Black Sabbath′s remake"!. He is such as GRANDE as his own GRANDE late father!. He is absolutely a nice humorous man, he laughed alot!.!.!.I love Italy and their fellows!.Www@Enter-QA@Com


Answers:
!.!.!.I agree that it seems that the majority of the films being produced, in this day and age, are either remakes of earlier films, or theatrical recreations of popular art, from television and comic books, and that is definitely indicating a seemingly lack of creative ideas, these days!. However, I cannot wholly and totally enbrazen against sequels and remakes, as long as the filmmakers have something new and interesting to add to the already established proceedings!.!.!.!.

!.!.!.one has to understand that sequels and remakes have been the order since way back in the '30's and '40's, and whether egotistically motivated, or whether by fan base demands, there will almost always be some filmmaker out there, who depending upon the movie in question, is confidently assured, or perhaps foolhardedly convinced that he/she can do it better!.!.!.!.and incredibly enough, there actually have been the 'few and far between' cases, where the former, rather than the latter, has rang to be true (!.!.!.the recent 're-invention' of "The Hulk", as compared to director Ang Lee's moody, action-less and psychologically-driven version, a few years ago)!.!.!.!.!.

!.!.!.I'm of the opinion that as far as remakes of seemingly 'untouchable', meaningful and well-established film properties, the philosophy really should be, "!.!.!.if it ain't broke, don't fix it!!"!. This brings me to a rather inquisitive point, with regards to remakes: why not go back and fix and/or correct those dreaded and abhored (!.!.!.or perhaps underappreciated) films, which for whatever reason, did not make the grade, with respects to the general motion picture watching crowd, and have been systematically relegated to the status of reputed cinematic 'turkeys'!?!?Www@Enter-QA@Com



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories