Should movies be cencored at all?!
Question: Should movies be cencored at all!?
Should the movies get released without go through the censor!? It is upto the audience to decide whether the movie has appropriate content or not!. If they don't like what they see, they are free to walk out of the cinema hall!. As far as adult content is concerned, can there be a rating system that specifies the minimum age requied to view a movie but doesn't censor the movie!?
By censoring the movies before they are released, does the censor board assume that the audience don't know what is right and what is wrong!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
By censoring the movies before they are released, does the censor board assume that the audience don't know what is right and what is wrong!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
i think movies shud nt b censored
cmmon v shud decyd which movies 2 watch n which nt 2
dey shud nt intefere wid our choice
n if a movie iz nt worth watchin den it ll flop neway
so y 2 create such a hype 4 it!?!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
cmmon v shud decyd which movies 2 watch n which nt 2
dey shud nt intefere wid our choice
n if a movie iz nt worth watchin den it ll flop neway
so y 2 create such a hype 4 it!?!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
In my opinion, certain things offend people, and are still thought of as a society as something not everyone needs to see!. If you ask me, I think it is sad that so many possible good movies are made, but the language/nudity/violence in them are so bad that people (such as myself) who get offended by those actions never get to see the movie!. If it is just language, I can wait til it comes out on DVD and watch it at home b/c I have a TVGuardian that blocks out "foul" language!. The kinds of things that are on movies now would have women fainting in the aisles not too long ago!. I wish movies would be how they used to!.!.!.!.sigh!.!.!.I am sure I will be in the minority opinion on that one, though!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
As far as I'm concerned, the age rating and specific reason(s) listen below are more than enough warning, movies do not need to be censored, merely rated!. Some of us would like to see the full version, regardless of any inappropriate scenes!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
I think we are watching the censored movies right now!.
What all you have written is already there, but I think they don't apply anything!. Every now & then you can see a adult/sex scene in almost movies, so where is the restrictions!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
What all you have written is already there, but I think they don't apply anything!. Every now & then you can see a adult/sex scene in almost movies, so where is the restrictions!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
If a movie contains nudity, it is recommended to censor, in other way there is no need to censor,because someone with a little peas of mind can understand, that isn't real!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Yeah, I really want 3 year old babies screaming their heads off while I watch Rambo!. Keep your freakin' kids out of my movies!. That includes 16 year-olds, they don't know how to shut up either!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
no please dont do that, make sure those movies have A certificate and dont let children watch them, and dont play them in Television tooWww@Enter-QA@Com
!.!.!. well I don't think movies should show prejudices and things like that(unless viewed in a negative light) because it influences people, but swearing and gore is all right with me!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
no, i wana see the reall thing! ;]Www@Enter-QA@Com
The rating system is completely arbitrary and absurd!. If you want to see how corrupt the MPAA is, watch the documentary "This Film is Not Yet Rated"!. There are way too many problems with the whole system!. For example, if a film has a fully nude man or woman walking around and some decent sex scene it will usually get slapped with an NC-17 rating and most theaters won't carry it!. If a film has some F-bombs and some brief nudity and some sex it will get an R rating!. If a film has no swearing and no sex, but shows multiple killings it can get a PG-13 and kids can see it!. Why is sex and swearing worse than murder!?
The MPAA uses it's power to persuade the filmmaker or producer to remove certain parts by threatening to rate the film NC-17 (which usually results in a financial loss)!. The MPAA doesn't have any set standards, so they can pick and choose who they bully and who they don't!.
There should be some sort of system to let the audience know what they're getting into before hand, but that system should have no clout or authority, they should just work like the website "Commonsensemedia!.org"!. The MPAA is completely corruptWww@Enter-QA@Com
The MPAA uses it's power to persuade the filmmaker or producer to remove certain parts by threatening to rate the film NC-17 (which usually results in a financial loss)!. The MPAA doesn't have any set standards, so they can pick and choose who they bully and who they don't!.
There should be some sort of system to let the audience know what they're getting into before hand, but that system should have no clout or authority, they should just work like the website "Commonsensemedia!.org"!. The MPAA is completely corruptWww@Enter-QA@Com
The intent of the ratings process isn't really censorship, but rather, offering a basic guide to viewers to help judge the content!. While obviously, you can't know a film without seeing it, you can get an idea if it's got things YOU find objectionable (me, I'm from Jersey, nothing phases me) without potentially wasting your money!. Or exposing your kids to things YOU don't think they're ready for (and I let my kids see films rated beyond their usual comfort level after checking them out for myself, first!.!.!. you can do that when you know the people you're looking out for, the ratings board can't be that specific)!.
Basically, the ratings boards aren't censoring any films!.!.!. other than something judged potentially illegal (and that, too, is a soft thing!.!.!. the notion of whether something is "obscene" varies by where you live), they're simply stating their opinion as to the rating!. It's the film company saying "whoa! we can't release this as an NC-17 film, that's suicide in the marketplace"!.
However, that's really something society's created, and continues to create!. There was a time when it was "X" rated films were considered something sleezy, and so they created "NC-17" to allow an official rating for films for adults only that are not simply some kind of sexploitation film (not that there's anything wrong with that for adults if that's their thing, just that you'd never have any other kind of film released with an X rating)!. And now, most theaters won't show most (or any) NC-17 films, so the studios still cut for "R" if necessary!.
If you're going to have a ratings system, which in itself isn't actually censorship, there will always be the content creators (or more likely, owners) doing self-censorship for economic reasons!. And probably some disparity, since it's a judgement call!.!. different people will rate the same film differently (which, of course, is why it's never a single person's decision, but it's still not a perfect system)!.
And note, this actually works both ways!.!. if the ratings board gives you film a "G" or "PG" rating, and it's intended, say, for teenage boys, you WILL go back and add some violence, sex, or foul language enough to get a PG-13 or R rating, simply because you KNOW that teen boys don't see G films and generally want something "harder" than PG!.
There's no law preventing any adult from seeing a film of any rating!. For the other ratings, kids can see anything through R as long as accompanied by an adult!.!.!. in other words, society is saying they're not ready for adults-only viewing, but it's up to their parents or guardians beyond that!.
And this only applies to theatrical releases, or television (with a different but similar set of ratings criteria)!. You get more censorship on TV, depending on the outlet, because some popular films won't meet the standards of the network censors!. DVD releases are very often sold in rathed and unrated editions!.!.!. perhaps restoring whatever 1!.2 minute bit they had to cut to get that "R" rating!.
And of course, that only pertains toWww@Enter-QA@Com
Basically, the ratings boards aren't censoring any films!.!.!. other than something judged potentially illegal (and that, too, is a soft thing!.!.!. the notion of whether something is "obscene" varies by where you live), they're simply stating their opinion as to the rating!. It's the film company saying "whoa! we can't release this as an NC-17 film, that's suicide in the marketplace"!.
However, that's really something society's created, and continues to create!. There was a time when it was "X" rated films were considered something sleezy, and so they created "NC-17" to allow an official rating for films for adults only that are not simply some kind of sexploitation film (not that there's anything wrong with that for adults if that's their thing, just that you'd never have any other kind of film released with an X rating)!. And now, most theaters won't show most (or any) NC-17 films, so the studios still cut for "R" if necessary!.
If you're going to have a ratings system, which in itself isn't actually censorship, there will always be the content creators (or more likely, owners) doing self-censorship for economic reasons!. And probably some disparity, since it's a judgement call!.!. different people will rate the same film differently (which, of course, is why it's never a single person's decision, but it's still not a perfect system)!.
And note, this actually works both ways!.!. if the ratings board gives you film a "G" or "PG" rating, and it's intended, say, for teenage boys, you WILL go back and add some violence, sex, or foul language enough to get a PG-13 or R rating, simply because you KNOW that teen boys don't see G films and generally want something "harder" than PG!.
There's no law preventing any adult from seeing a film of any rating!. For the other ratings, kids can see anything through R as long as accompanied by an adult!.!.!. in other words, society is saying they're not ready for adults-only viewing, but it's up to their parents or guardians beyond that!.
And this only applies to theatrical releases, or television (with a different but similar set of ratings criteria)!. You get more censorship on TV, depending on the outlet, because some popular films won't meet the standards of the network censors!. DVD releases are very often sold in rathed and unrated editions!.!.!. perhaps restoring whatever 1!.2 minute bit they had to cut to get that "R" rating!.
And of course, that only pertains toWww@Enter-QA@Com