Do we really need more dumb James Bond childish action movies?!
Question: Ridiculous and overrated. I always disliked them. Since when spies "look" like this clown James Bond? Julius Rosenberg, executed in 1953 for supposedly passing nuclear secrets to the Russians was a shy, henpecked and meak guy. Nothing flamboyant in him. And others spies were mostly frustrated and drunkards, James Bond is ridiculous and fictitious. Why continue making these childish movies? Feedback, folks:
Answers: Ridiculous and overrated. I always disliked them. Since when spies "look" like this clown James Bond? Julius Rosenberg, executed in 1953 for supposedly passing nuclear secrets to the Russians was a shy, henpecked and meak guy. Nothing flamboyant in him. And others spies were mostly frustrated and drunkards, James Bond is ridiculous and fictitious. Why continue making these childish movies? Feedback, folks:
It seems to me that they are going to keep making them, and now ever since they now have Daniel Criag now playing Bond himself. But since you don't like the movies, or at least you claim not to. My question to you is who said you have to watch them? You have the choice to either wathc or not watch them, but I wouldn't call them dumb or childish, but remember when the next movie comes out, don't pay your money to see them. They are just going to make them whether we need them or not. So it looks like to me, that there is no end in site to the James Bond franichse that started in 1962 with the movie Dr. No.
James Bond or the ridiculous "Austin Powers" are more fictionals than Looney Tunes' "Bugs Bunny". And I wonder why "insults" just to disagree with me? Not you but "Show Stopper" idiot. Anyway, read real spies stories. They are better. Report It
Other Answers (7)