What is the worse film "remake" you ever saw?!


Question: For me its got to be the Dukes of Hazzard.The sheriff Roscoe and Boss Hogg characters are badly portrayed and have hardly any humour about them,such as the originals.


Answers: For me its got to be the Dukes of Hazzard.The sheriff Roscoe and Boss Hogg characters are badly portrayed and have hardly any humour about them,such as the originals.

Psycho... worst ten dollars I ever spent.

...when a stranger calls.
I always remembered my dad telling me that scary story when I was little and I was so excited to see it and have it bring back these memories and scare me... I slept through most of it. can you say lame?

the thunderbirds

Psycho. What a flaming travesty. If Hitchcock wasn't dead, THAT would have killed him.

I saw the second pride and prejudice first and then saw first one. I hated the first one compared to the second..... does that count?

the hills have eyes, and the hills have eyes 2.

HOLY ****. worst "horror" flick i have ever seen. the original was soo much better. the story was bland and predictable, the gory parts weren't even that gory, and the worst thing is, IT WASN't EVEN SCARY. just annoying and boring to watch.

Psycho

planet of the apes

halloween was effin horibble... the original ones were waaaaaay better!

Both the 1980s version of 'King Kong' and the Peter Jackson version were massive wastes of time, in my opinion. I couldn't believe that Jackson had been wanting to make 'King Kong' since before LOTR - he only had one idea, which was to make it as nasty as possible. It sucked.

However, for sheer expensive boneheaded pointlessness, the shot-for-shot Gus Van Sant version of 'Psycho' really takes the biscuit.



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories