Inaccuracy in the Spider Man series......?!
Question: I was watching Spider Man 2 the other day and there was a scene at the Daily Bugle where J.J. Jameson was talking to Robbie in his office about getting a picture of Doc Ock and Robbie said ,"Brock has been on it all week" or something along those lines refering to Eddie Brock. But on Spider Man 3 Eddie Brock was introducing himself to JJ for the first time trying to get a job. WTF? Did they forget that they already said he was working for the Daily Bugle, and how come Venom kept refering to himself as "I" instead of "We". He never said I in the comics, he always said We.....
Answers: I was watching Spider Man 2 the other day and there was a scene at the Daily Bugle where J.J. Jameson was talking to Robbie in his office about getting a picture of Doc Ock and Robbie said ,"Brock has been on it all week" or something along those lines refering to Eddie Brock. But on Spider Man 3 Eddie Brock was introducing himself to JJ for the first time trying to get a job. WTF? Did they forget that they already said he was working for the Daily Bugle, and how come Venom kept refering to himself as "I" instead of "We". He never said I in the comics, he always said We.....
I see your point, I noticed that too. I dont think Sam Raimi wanted to involve Venom in the series at all, I remember reading something about him really disliking the Venom character. He prolly threw his name into the mix in Spider Man 2 just to shut the fans up and was prolly pursuaded to include Venom in the 3rd movie by the higher ups at Sony. So I wouldn't take the whole Venom in Spider Man series too seriously, imho they didnt do him justice. And I 100% agree with you on the "We" thing. I know its not going to go off the comic ver batim but "We" was a pretty big signature thing of Venoms and that was a pretty big thing of his to leave off. Venom was 2 seperate entites, Eddie Brock and the Symbiote. The movie didnt bring life to the Symbiote excepting making the host evil and thats all. Not to mention Peter was able to take the Symbiote costume off in the movie, which in the comic he didnt have to which is why he loved it so much because the suit could change into clothes making it easy for him to change.....
Huh... I never noticed that.
I don't think we were supposed to know about Eddie Brock at all. They just picked a name we knew and went with it. Or perhaps Eddie Brock always took photos for J.J. and mailed them to him or sent a messenger to send the photos and this is the first time they finally met in person.
I don't see a continuity problem as you posed it. Just because Robbie knows who Brock is and just because Brock works there doesn't mean JJJ has met him.
If you want to get into the comics, I don't remember Spidey having organic webshooters for that matter. That's the biggest problem with the movies for me: no mechanical webshooters.
Bottom line? The movies are not canon and they aren't very good.
Good catch.
Most of those movies have SO many continuity errors I wouldn't even know where to begin.
Look at those god-awful Fantastic Four movies. And WHY did they give X-Men 3 to the Rush Hour guy?
Look at how badly the Hulk, Superman Returns, Catwoman, Elektra, the Punisher and Ghost Rider turned out. Ick!
Cool another inaccuracy in spider-man 1 is that when he breaks the lamp with his spider powers you see the lamp back in place after the camera goes back to peter
are you losing any sleep over it? how come you didn't ask about bruce campbell being in all 3 movies , but playing a different character..that seems odd..i got that one right away.. your question seems to be that you enjoy comic books over movies. but do you really think sam rami really cares about it. he probably did that to piss all the comic book lovers off..