What were the arguments in the 1997 Movie 12 Angry Men?!
Question:
What were the arguments in the 1997 Movie 12 Angry Men?
What were the arguments for the guilty aspects? What were the arguments for the nonguilty aspects? Were their illogical or unreasonable arguments and what were they?
Answers:
The evidence didn't hold up; but the men were not being objective. They were voting from their personal experiences. Henry Fonda's character (in the original movie) had to make them look at themselves before they could come up with a judicious verdict, which was acquittal. The original movie is a classic and shouldn't be missed.