What do you think of someone who gets in the horoscope category and gives answer!
Question: of Astrology using scientific jargon in a superior like manner? What is his motivation for doing this, and what do you think his natal chart looks like?
Answers: of Astrology using scientific jargon in a superior like manner? What is his motivation for doing this, and what do you think his natal chart looks like?
yep, my best guess is Aquarian too, or any of the Fixed signs (Leo,Scorpio,Taurus) stubborn and hard headed, though theyre smart, theyre not flexible and that is one of their weakness.
hes trying to convince people of something that hes not even 100% sure of, and base these stuff on practical evidence and he thinks he already knows everything. its really retarded to me, its a waste of his time and everybody's time, hes just stubborn, i dont really know what else to say to that.
this section was made for people who has questions about astrology, its Y/A horoscope. its not Y/A horoscope debate.
yet he comes here everyday and post quotes from dead people and alike
ignore as u r into it w/o understanding the nuances of life/astrology
IDK. Posters like to use scientifc terms which doesn't even properly answer the question. What can you do. I answer in a simple fashion, on time, all the time. Who ares about the mechanics of a car as long as it goes from A to B with a full gas tank.
Haha, well Janet if we're thinking of the same person (and I'm pretty sure we are)..IMO....he's just exhibiting a classic Aquarian commitment to his cause, as well as the rebellious and shocking side of said sign (why else would he be right in the thick of things, stirring the pot?) Chart weighted towards air and earth, to be sure, and probably heavy on the fixed signs in general as well, but I don't think it's as unbalanced in that direction as one might think.
Personally, I welcome his posts to any Q I might ask (provided he's actually answering the question and not just spouting anti-astrology rhetoric and posting links to randi.org)..an opposing viewpoint isn't a bad thing, it just makes you think more about your own viewpoint. AND when he's actually putting thought into his answers instead of cutting and pasting and posting links, he puts together very solid (if somewhat biased:-p) arguments to support his cause.
Address a question to them or
e-mail them and ask why
Request
PLACE OF BIRTH
TIME OF BIRTH
MONTH,DAY,YEAR OF BIRTH
IF THEY GO FOR IT,IT MIGHT PROVE
INTERESTING
He's a left-brained logical stick-in-the-mud type who's lost touch with the intuitive, feeling side of himself. I bet it's the same if someone says 'I love you' to him...he'd go 'Really? How? Prove it!'
I read from one of my favorite spiritual gurus that there are actually 3 realms in existence: the known, unknown and the unknowable. I reckon even with the scientific birth charts calculated and generated, Astrology (especially spiritual/soul astrology) still somehow falls under the category of the Unknowable.
My point is, not believing in something or knowing how something works doesn't negate its effects - as long as the answers are there, that's all that matters. He's asking us to show him some concrete evidence and i really want to tell him - how do we show you something that we FEEL to be true from within, the Soul?
His intelligence - knowledge which has been accumulated over the years & in the end, comes down to nothing - is commendable but the intuitive part of him has long been dead and buried.
Just my 2 cents worth..
Negate the validity? If it is not belief oriented, it does not matter. How about a series of testing that astrologers and scientists both could agree on? Would you accept the results even if they show astrology is not valid? I could accept proof in favor for astrology.