George Clinton is seriously badder than Jim Morrison, Mick Jager, anyone, agreed!


Question:

George Clinton is seriously badder than Jim Morrison, Mick Jager, anyone, agreed?

Additional Details

3 weeks ago
Clinton did in fact flash his **** on stage FREQUENTLY in 1970-71

3 weeks ago
And I didn't catch this, but because of that racist comment you don't know **** about George Clinton and Parliament-Funkadelic. Listen to their music and don't judge P-Funk off George Clinton's silly mugshot circa 2003!!!


Answers:

NOPE.
First of all I gotta jab some gal that responded before me. 'Badder' is a word. 'Gooder' is not.
And down to the core,'Anyway we choose to communicate, as long as both parties understand each other, it is communication and grammar takes a back seat'.

NOW, Jim was a pioneer. He didn't want to be a bad ***. He just believed in his music and screw everybody else. He was also a hopeless drug addict. Can you imagine the art he would have produce if he wasn't tripping half the time?
Now Mick. Hell, the stones were THERE when that 'style' of music was considered vulgar.
Bad asses? yeah. Imagine being told that your music,lyrics,body movements(music and a show that YOU CREATED as an artist) on stage will get you pepper sprayed and thrown in jail...... and you do it anyway in a time when it was UNHEARD OF and most of society didn't 'get' their music.They didn't give a ****. They weren't trying to start a revolution, they just DID! They were all about the music.
Pulling your male appendage out doens't make you a bad *** onstage. Hell, I passed two homeless dudes today at the bridge with their 'tools' pulled out pissing(or WHATEVER) into the water. My first thoughts? Well, it wasn't ,"Wow, way badder than some previous REAL musicians that I'm riding on the tail coats of".

My opinion.
D


The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories