Naruto Deathtole has rised to 2?!
Question: http://darkdiamond.net/web-notes/boy-die...
http://www.tv.com/story/11008.html
enjoy
Answers: http://darkdiamond.net/web-notes/boy-die...
http://www.tv.com/story/11008.html
enjoy
what the hell is wrong wif these kids?
OMG!
Technically that's not a question. plus, its not the shows fault, its the kids fault.
DANG!
Ummmmm
Why would you post this
To make us feel bad?
Kids should know attempting those moves is impossible those are just cartoon characters and have the ability because of computer animation....
It is very sad but you shouldn't be making us feel bad because of it
Anyways I do not even watch Naruto
First of all I think that was the parents fault, they had to watch him at least from time to time...no letting him play without checking him out. But I really fell sorry for the kid. Condolence to his family.
This is what happens when you let KIDS watch things like this.
You can expect most people (old enough) to have discretion about things, but not everyone. And thats the problem, even people in their adulthood dont.
They lose themselves in this sort of fantasy (have you ever known anyone thats an anime-addict? If not, try going to a convention.) and to let kids watch an unlimited amount of anime (or any sort of violent/sexist media) is just wrong.
And as a side, its not like anime are the most sensible media to watch. Some are quite discriminatory and sexist (Naruto for sure, if you can read inbetween the lines), and also violent.
I dont think anyone really cares about that fact. But oh well, here you go, a poor kid dies from it. Most people will call it stupid but really, hes just a kid, what does he know better? Especially when you let him watch crap like that. You might as well let him watch a movie like Sin City and the like.
wow omg that's so sad! damn you why did you ask that so we would n't watch naruto ant more it's the kids falt for watch some that's clearly not for young kids it's mainly for teens that makes me so pissed and you for show that your wrong.
THIS IS JUST A BUNCH OF IGITS POSTING CRAP TO CONFUSE YOU TILL YOUR BRAIN CRUMBLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...
So the last time that you posted this you didn't learn your lesson?
Listen, as sad as a child's death is, hater's like you are the real problem. You use this to your advantage to make a point. I'm willing to bet that you believe that video games lead to school shootings too.
You can stop posting these ridiculous questions now, and save us all the trouble of wasting time posting defense for something that parents should have control over.
Listen, under normal circumstances, a child cannot learn anything from passive media (TV, movies, radio, books, etc.). What passive media can do is reinforce concepts already planted in the child's mind. What this means is, if mom and dad and aunts, uncles, grandparents and siblings are teaching the child things, they will accept the primacy of those sources over TV no matter what the TV tells them. That's why cartoons generally aren't harmful to children even though they're filled with complete nonsense and mayhem: if the family has been doing its job of teaching the child they'll understand how silly those cartoon physics are. That's what's supposed to produce the laughter: the disparity of cartoon reality from reality.
Now, where passive media can teach a child something is if that child is a void medium. What I mean is, if mom and dad (and brother, sister, auntie, uncle, grandma, grandpa, etc.) don't teach a child anything, the child will not have a more primary source of information than the passive media in which they are engaged. This is increasingly a problem for several reasons: for one, for the first time in the history of the civilized world, both parents are likely to have careers, meaning the child is more likely than ever to spend more time with the passive media than his own parents. For another, we are at a historical low for fertility rates in the west, meaning children are more likely than ever to be only children and therefore have no brothers or sisters and, for that matter, aunts and uncles. For yet another, divorce rates are at a historic high in the west as well, and increasingly these divorces are occurring in longstanding relationships (20+ years) which is another historical first, so grandma and grandpa might not even be around. And even if a child is lucky enough to have a largely intact extended family, due to modern conveniences of mobility and modern reconception of the family (grandma and grandpa are less likely to move in with the family late in life, extended families are less likely to spend more than five or six days a year together) the child is unlikely to have any meaningful contact with his now-distant relatives.
Add into this a continuing distrust of strangers that means that kids have fewer friends and many fewer trusted adults from outside the family than in hundreds of years despite massive innovations in both child safety and communication, and it's a testament to the strength of natural human ingenuity that more kids don't do stupid things they saw on TV.
There is, of course, one oft-advocated replacement for all of these things: school. While it is true that kids consider school a more primary source than passive media (and always will no matter how little they respect it; school actually forces them to interact with their instructors in most cases, especially elementary schools [with which we are primarily concerned]) schools are also becoming less and less interactive and demanding less and less discipline and respect from their students, meaning their strength as a primary source gets diluted more with each passing year. In addition, schools can teach information but they should not teach values. In a free society, the decision of which values to tech rest with the family. Otherwise, which values should schools teach? Parents have a hard enough time arguing out what to teach the kids. Societies certainly won't be able to agree on what should be taught to everyone's child.
And of course the real reason not to have schools replace families as the teacher of values: do you really want your kids to be raised by the state? Should congress decide what's important for your kids to learn? If you plan on having kids some day and you don't like the president or congress right now (and the numbers say you almost certainly don't if you're on a message board right now) it should be food for thought.
And as for your first story on this, I find it rather interesting that it was a belt when that hasn't happened in the series. Strange now isn't it? Care to defend that statement?
but ........... when did naruto do something with a belt or strangling :S
im gonna say what's true, this type of thing ONLY happens in America!! I've never heard of such a thing happen in Australia, Britain or Canada, i think it's all American mentality, if something like this happened anywhere else we'd know about it, but it's ALWAYS COMING FROM AMERICA! ALWAYS!! it's their culture and ways of thinking especially kids that's messed up.