Was Miley Cyrus' vanity fair pics really THAT offencive?!


Question: Was Miley Cyrus' vanity fair pics really THAT offencive!?
was Miley Cyrus' vanity fair pics really THAT offencive!?
Was it too much for a 15 yr old!?
Should she still be a childs idol!?
was she trying to be more grown up!?
Or is it the new trend of whats to come for the young celebrities, I mean look at Lindsay Lohans 14 yr old sister
she went from this:
http://i26!.tinypic!.com/s6k9wm!.jpg
to THIS:
http://i25!.tinypic!.com/16bkh34!.jpgWww@Enter-QA@Com


Answers:
i think shes just trying to grow up a little to fast
-her 21 year old friend
-her bff can go to clubs and everytihng
-the pictures she took and shes only 15
-she keeps taking the retardest pics over and over againWww@Enter-QA@Com

well maybe Miley whats to have a different target age group, she doesnt want to be little girls role model
but shes only15 and posing topless!.
ya i dont think so!.
She's trying to grow up wayyyyyyy to fast!.
i mean 6-14 year olds look up to her!
i sure wouldnt want my 6 year old sister looking up to her and wanting to be like her!.

**have you seen the pics of her and her b!.f!. (her in a black bra and he has his hands on her hip) have you seen the one her pulling down her shirt and showing her green bra,have you seen the one her posing in undies!?**
ya thats not a good role model!!!
heres the pics: http://snagwiremedia!.com/wickedyouth/200!.!.!.
http://perezhilton!.com/2008-04-21-fill-i!.!.!.
http://oceanup!.typepad!.com/oceanup/2008/!.!.!.
http://oceanup!.typepad!.com/oceanup/2008/!.!.!.




and her 21 year old best friend!!!
ya thats not a good role model!!!Www@Enter-QA@Com

not a big deal at all!.

also the two pics of lindsays sister, the first one she looks like an 8 year old, the 2nd one she looks MUCH hotter and grown up!

and its not a bad thing to look older than you are!.!. look around everyone is doing it/wanting to do it, why when celebrities do it its so terrible then ya turn around and ya best friend is doin the same thing! odd

EDIT: and wow i completely agree with Gabby, best answer her please!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

I think the pictures covered more than some shirts and dresses would, just because it was a sheet people are flipping out!. I think they are artistic and I understand that she doesn't want to always be posing in sparkle covered disney clothes!. She isn't ten, she's fifteen and they were not as big of a deal as the Vanessa pictures!. Pictures in which Miley is covered in a sheet do not mean she is going to show up pregnant or in rehab next month!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

I'm not a huge fan of her, but I'm starting to feel sorry for her!. They told her that she was posing for some artistic thing, but instead they stuck it in their magazine as some risque thing just to sell more copies and make more money!. She had no clue that this is what they were going to do!. All that was showing was her back!.!. who hasn't seen a back!? When someone wears a baithing suit you see way more than just a back!. So, I think people need to give her some slack, because this wasn't a big deal!. People are on her for everything, you just hear thing after thing about her, and honestly I'm starting to feel bad!. She has a private life too that people don't need to know EVERYTHING about!. And just because she was naked under the sheet doesn't mean anything!. She didn't actualy take it off and go total porn star!. So you people shouldn't be assuming that she's going to end up like all those other people who messed up their lives!. This is just my opinion, and I repsect everyones, not matter what they say!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

I was wondering what the all the fuss was about!.She wasn't butt-naked!.She had something over her,and I think this is blown way out of proportion!.Get over it!It's not like she posed in Playboy!.It looked like a normal regular looking picture to me!.

I'm getting sick of this so-called "Scandal"!.It is not a scandal!.Enough is enough!.She shouldn't have had to apologize either!.

Edit:Thank you Jewel C!.I agree with you too!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

They weren't that bad! They were quite artistic and it's not like they showed anything that you wouldn't see while she was wearing a backless top!.

I don't see why she couldn't still be a Disney Idol and as she grows then ofcourse she's going to try different images!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

No!. Those Miley Cyrus pics weren't that bad!. They were artistic!. It was her other weido perv pictures that are bad and not very good to have circlating on the web!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

It's not like they were even that exposing!. She is still a role model to thousands of young people!. She doesn't need the extra pressure of people bullying her for taking some pictures!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

No they are blowing it way out proportion!. They are not THAT bad!. It probably wasen't the best idea but come on, its not like she was nude or anything!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

they werent that exposingWww@Enter-QA@Com



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories